Law Bachelor Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words

Law Bachelor - Essay ExampleYang. So, Ying and Yang cannot enforce Meis initial offer.IntentionMei, Ying and Yang were colleagues, and not professional gamblers. The general presumption is that there was no legal intention involved. However, the presumption can be rebutted, winning into consideration the seriousness of the consequences. But assessed objectively, the presumption cant be set aside due to the lack of all written or communicatory accept acceptance of Meis initial offer.Consideration Finally, Mei refused to share the winnings, although initially she volunteered to buy one last ticket on behalf of them all. Courts will not intervene, for a contract didnt exist at all. It was a verbal contract till four weekly tickets were purchased with the $120 won from the first ticket. The final instance is an evidence akin to Australian Woollen Mills Pty Ltd v democracy (1954). Meis proposal was merely a statement and not an offer capable of acceptance. This mentioned clearly in what is asseverate to be an offer should have been intended to give rise, on the doing of the act to an obligationin the absence of much(prenominal) an intention, actual or imputed, the alleged offer cannot lead to a contract there is indeed in such a case no true offer. (Graw Stephen, An Introduction to the Contract 5th edition, Lawbook Co. 2005, p. 41) . Question 2 Ying was devolve of her long musical career so on 3 April she offered to sell her piano to Molly for $3500, utter that she would keep the offer open for ten days. Molly already had two pianos in her shop and was consequently reluctant to buy it. However, always ready to try for a bargain, she replied on 6 April with a verbal offer to buy it for $2500. This was not acceptable to Ying. In the meantime, Molly had... During 2003 the life of an Aboriginal artist, Albert Namatjira, was celebrated in a number of ways, including an exhibition in the Art Gallery of South Australia of his paintings from the 1930s to 1958. A lbert Namatjira had a number of relatives who in addition produced similar paintings of varying quality. Alberts paintings are more valuable than those of other family members.Boondok, a dealer in paintings, situated a painting of a desert landscape in colour with the name Namatjira written in the bottom corner of the painting. He paid $50 for it. This painting was painted by one of Alberts cousins and was deserving approximately $500. Boondok knew this. Albert Namatjira always signed his paintings, Albert Namatjira in the bottom corner of each painting he did.Boondok situated his landscape painting in his gallerys front window with a price tag of $8,000 on it. Tex, a tourist, saw Boondoks painting on display. Tex said to Boondok, I have always wanted a true(a) Namatjira and here it is. I will buy it. Boondok replied, It is always nice to buy something that pleases you. Hope you enjoy the painting.The complainant bought a bottle of wine from the defendant.The plaintiff was in jured due to the sudden ejection of a out of sight stopper when he opened the bottle at his home.